If a limited company director feels that a CVL may be the appropriate course of action, they should call shareholders to a general meeting.
Shareholders are entitled to receive 14 days’ notice before attending such a meeting.
That meeting has two clear goals: to vote on winding up the company (sometimes called voluntary winding up, or CVL), and to appoint a named insolvency practitioner (liquidator).
We look at how shareholders can force a liquidation on a company even if the directors do not want to go down that route.
Shareholders and Directors Conflict?
If the directors take the insolvency test and it fails, this gives grounds to cease trading and seek professional insolvency advice. Disputes are unsurprisingly, relatively commonplace between the directors and the shareholders.
In many cases, the directors are themselves shareholders, but this is not always true. It may be that the company director has no shares at all in which case it’s easy to see why a difference of opinion may arise.
When a significant dispute arises, seek mediation immediately. Protracted disagreement will cost the company money, via disruption of business and possible legal proceedings.
If you refuse to consider mediation, the costs of any litigation may be awarded against you, and for that reason, refusal is fraught with risk.
Percentage of the vote is Required for the Shareholders to put a Company into Liquidation?
The percentage of a vote that is needed by a shareholder to adopt a special resolution is a 75% majority of those voting, they are voting on a voluntary winding-up to take place.
What happens if shareholders block liquidation?
Should shareholders try to block a liquidation, it would be valuable to hold a meeting with them. The meeting would need to have minutes takes with a view to explaining directors’ legal obligations to creditors, and the necessity to cease trading when insolvent.
Waiting for a creditor to forcibly liquidate the company could result in action against the director(s) personally, including being held liable for any additional debts incurred by the creditors.
In order to resolve this type of liquidation ‘stalemate,’ a director or shareholder who believes the company should be liquidated could force the situation using a specific type of winding up petition.
How can shareholders force liquidation?
A liquidation and be forced by shareholders and directors via a ‘just and equitable’ winding up petition. This type of liquidation is triggered by the courts, it is commonly used to end a deadlock where shareholders are wanting to block the liquidation process.
Should there be two directors who can’t agree on whether to liquidate this process is also used. The court decides whether voluntary liquidation of the company is the best route to take. Although it is a viable option, these types of winding up petitions are quite rare. The court has to take into consideration whether they believe mutual trust and confidence has evaporated – which is often the case in a 50/50 shareholder deadlock.
Winding up on Just and Equitable Grounds under the Insolvency Act 1986 and the Companies Act 2006 is used by shareholders if :
- If the Company is deadlocked, but solvent, then the Court can be petitioned to wind the Company up.
- This is usually pleaded alternatively to relief under a minority shareholder petition above
Minority Shareholder Petition
If a dispute between directs and shareholders cannot be resolved then to solve a dispute shareholders can apply to court for an order under a s994 minority shareholders petition.
- Such a Petition, presented to the High Court, often alleges that the shareholder has been unfairly prejudiced by the way in which the Company is run. The Court will examine the commercial context and background.
- The minority shareholder may also be a director who becomes excluded from the management of the Company causing a breakdown in trust and confidence.
- Often the Court will order that the minority shareholders shares are bought for a fair value. The minority shareholder has a right to financial information of the Company, which would go towards considering what a fair value may be.
Read more: Removing a 50/50 business partner
F.A.Q’s
Yes a shareholder can force a company into liquidation if the can muster 75% of the votes to pass a special resolution at a general meeting.
Shareholders can for directors to agree to a liquidation if the business fails the insolvency test, the directors have a duty to creditors and shareholders. If the director fails to ensure creditors and shareholders interests are not paramount, shareholders can demand to call a general meeting. The shareholders at that stage can force the company into liquidation if the have 75% of the votes. Can a shareholder force a company into liquidation
Can shareholders force a fellow director to agree to liquidation
Conclusion
In the United Kingdom, if shareholders wish to force liquidation there is a provision for liquidating a company under “just and equitable grounds,” which is a means of resolving conflicts among the owners. If the owners of a company are unable to agree on a course of action and the situation becomes deadlocked, they may seek to have the company liquidated through the courts.
In such cases, the courts will evaluate the situation and determine the best course of action for the company, which may involve liquidation or finding another resolution. This process allows the courts to take control of the situation and make a decision that is fair to all parties involved.
Read more: How to remove a shareholder
With over three decades of experience in the business and turnaround sector, Steve Jones is one of the founders of Business Insolvency Helpline. With specialist knowledge of Insolvency, Liquidations, Administration, Pre-packs, CVA, MVL, Restructuring Advice and Company investment.